<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Classification levels]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The field/metadata "Importance" contains some classification values  (Personal data, Confidential, ...) and importance values (Normal, High, ...) all mixed. The need of a new field "Classification" seems to be important to separate both meaning (Importance and Classification/Dissemination). Here are the proposed values :</p>
<table class="table table-bordered table-striped">
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="text-align:center">Diffusion</th>
<th style="text-align:left">Value</th>
<th style="text-align:center">Rules</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left"><strong>Civilian</strong></td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">Not Classified (default)</td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">C1 - Internal Use</td>
<td style="text-align:center">B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">C2 - Restricted Distribution</td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">C3 – Secret / Confidential</td>
<td style="text-align:center">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left"><strong>Military (FR)</strong></td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">Restricted Distribution</td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">Secret-Defense</td>
<td style="text-align:center">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">Top Secret-Defense</td>
<td style="text-align:center">A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p dir="auto">The NATO and TLP (CISA - Cybersecurity &amp; Infrastructure Security Agency) classifications will be added to these lists if necessary.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.ceo-vision.com/topic/771/classification-levels</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 20:06:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.ceo-vision.com/topic/771.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 18:41:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Classification levels on Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:43:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">As part of the follow-up for this post, we have created an equivalence table (for information purposes only) between various standards and recommendations regarding data classification:</p>
<table class="table table-bordered table-striped">
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="text-align:center">Civilian Organization</th>
<th style="text-align:center">Military France</th>
<th style="text-align:center">EUCI (Europe)</th>
<th style="text-align:center">TLP (CISA)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center">NC – Unclassified / Public</td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:center">TLP:CLEAR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center">C1 – Internal Use</td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:center">TLP:AMBER+STRICT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center">C2 – Restricted / Sensitive / (Confidential*)</td>
<td style="text-align:center">Restricted</td>
<td style="text-align:center">EU Restricted</td>
<td style="text-align:center">TLP:GREEN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:center">EU Confidential</td>
<td style="text-align:center">TLP:AMBER</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center">C3 – Secret / Sovereign Sensitive</td>
<td style="text-align:center">Secret</td>
<td style="text-align:center">EU Secret</td>
<td style="text-align:center">TLP:RED</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:center">Very Secret</td>
<td style="text-align:center">EU Top Secret</td>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p dir="auto">* <em>in GoFAST 4.5 and below, subject to future changes : Confidential will be moved to C3</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3771</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3771</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cpotter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:43:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Classification levels on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:34:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">Just to inform you that the European Union classification has been added in 4.2.0_HOTFIX_1.0 release:</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1713879248061-90e8c47b-ad91-40ff-977a-605d024bcc9b-image.png" alt="image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">Raphaël.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3211</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3211</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raphaël Badawi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:34:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Classification levels on Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:18:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I agree, there is now an overlap in "Criticity" and "Classification"</p>
<table class="table table-bordered table-striped">
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="text-align:center"></th>
<th style="text-align:left">Classification</th>
<th style="text-align:center">Criticity</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left"><strong>Civilian</strong></td>
<td style="text-align:center">Confidential Data</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">NC - Not Classified / Public</td>
<td style="text-align:center">Internal Distribution</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">C1 - Internal Use</td>
<td style="text-align:center">Personal data</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">C2 - Restricted Distribution</td>
<td style="text-align:center">Critical</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left">C3 – Secret / Confidential</td>
<td style="text-align:center">High</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left"></td>
<td style="text-align:center">Normal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center"></td>
<td style="text-align:left"></td>
<td style="text-align:center">Low</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p dir="auto">In our current view, "Confidential data" and "Internal Distribution" should be deleted to avoid overlap with the new "Classification" metadata.</p>
<p dir="auto">In your usecase you could use NC for your ¨Public" documents, C1 for your Instutitional use and C2 for Sensitive (we could perhaps rename "C2 - Restricted Distribution" by "C2 - Restricted / Sensitive".</p>
<p dir="auto">Is this makes sense ?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3188</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3188</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cpotter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:18:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Classification levels on Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:56:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/cpotter" aria-label="Profile: cpotter">@<bdi>cpotter</bdi></a><br />
Indeed, we use the EUCI scheme, and for non-classified information we would apply<br />
Public<br />
Institutional USE (default) (well, for you that would be "CEO-Vision use")<br />
SENSITIVE</p>
<p dir="auto">But that would not be a classification but a Criticity in GoFAST metadata. In terms of classification it is just unclassified; or perhaps one would add a TLP as information about sharing with third parties</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3186</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3186</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[aclassen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:56:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Classification levels on Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:08:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">NIST classification could also be considered :</p>
<ul>
<li>Restricted</li>
<li>Confidential</li>
<li>Public</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">but this is more or less what we introduced in the "Civilian" section. NIST just don't have the C1 - Internal use</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3183</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3183</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cpotter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:08:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Classification levels on Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:03:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Data classification will be introduced in GoFAST 4.2, we added U.S.CISA TLP standard and are considering to add the EU classified information (EUCI) <a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/general-secretariat/corporate-policies/classified-information/" rel="nofollow ugc">scheme</a>, which is :</p>
<ul>
<li>TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET: the unauthorised disclosure of this information could cause exceptionally grave prejudice to the essential interests of the EU or one or more of the member states.</li>
<li>SECRET UE/EU SECRET: the unauthorised disclosure of this information could seriously harm the essential interests of the EU or one or more of the member states.</li>
<li>CONFIDENTIEL UE/EU CONFIDENTIAL: the unauthorised disclosure of this information could harm the essential interests of the EU or one or more of the member states.</li>
<li>RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED: the unauthorised disclosure of this information could be disadvantageous to the interests of the EU or one or more of the member states.</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3181</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.ceo-vision.com/post/3181</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cpotter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:03:19 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>